I thought this was supposed to be funny. With no laughs in the first 30 minutes, we turned it off. Yawn.
Author Archives: Duff
DVD: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Has there ever been a movie this boring before? Thumbs way down.
Perhaps this is a problem only for those of us who watch way (WAY!) too many hours of TV.
But when different shows all use the same actor for guest spots, man it can get confusing. Say, for example, this summer (when I meant to blog about it) when Max Martini, who I do really enjoy, was on Dark Blue, Lie to Me, AND White Collar…ALL WITHIN A WEEK’S TIME. I kept getting confused as to whether he was good or bad!! At the time, I had chalked this up to “it’s hard to find guests in the summer” until the fall season started and this phenomenon started hitting me over the head every week.
Michael Gaston was a recurring (but not ‘regular’) assassin on Rubicon on Sundays…and then OH HAI a recurring lawyer on Terriers the following Tuesday. Jennifer Morrison played a total nutbar on Chase one week…and a sorta nutbar on How I Met Your Mother the following week.
Given that they are mostly guest spots, and that the actor involved probably would not know when they were airing, and shows probably don’t ask a guest “hey, have you done eps for any other shows lately?” I guess I can see how it could happen. But then a series regular on one show (Bobby on Supernatural) shows up as a guest spot on another show (The Mentalist)? (And, I don’t watch it, but his IMDB page lists him as popping up on Law & Order: LA as well!!) It’s crazymaking for a serious TV addict like me.
I could carry on with this list but I know you’re already bored. I just think there are more actors out there who could probably use a paycheck. Am I right?
Oooorah.
Why is it so entrancing watching a boy learn to be a soldier (and, presumably, a man at the same time)? I don’t know, but it is and not only do I love Officer and a Gentleman, but I also love every movie since then that is a cheap O&aG copy. Such as Annapolis. And The Guardian (on cable yesterday when I needed some downtime. Altho I do own it on DVD as well). (And one could even argue Top Gun belongs in that list.)
À la Nick Hornby, books in/books out for September.
Bought:
- Shiver, by Maggie Stiefvater (only $4 after coupons!)
- Linger, by Maggie Stiefvater (only $10 after coupons!)
Read:
- The Golden Compass, by Philip Pullman (re-read)
- The Subtle Knife, by Philip Pullman (re-read)
- The Amber Spyglass, by Philip Pullman (re-read)
- A Visit from the Goon Squad, by Jennifer Egan (gift)
- Faithful Place, by Tana French (gift)
- Shiver, by Maggie Stiefvater
- Linger, by Maggie Stiefvater
- The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, by David Mitchell (gift)
Give me more, I want more more more…TV, that is.
So yeah, I’m watching even MORE TV than ever these days. And I can’t believe that when I gave you my big summer TV roundup I forgot to mention White Collar!!
I mean, really, how could I? It was by far my favorite show this summer. It’s a mostly gun- and violence-free version of Burn Notice. The New York atmosphere is filmed in SUCH a fantastic way, it makes me CRAZY homesick. Super clever, super stylish, great relationships between the characters. I really love it. And the season finale had such great work from Matt Bomer. Even if I’ve had just as hard a time as anyone else caring very much about Kate (I mean, we’ve never seen any real evidence of them having a great relationship or her actually being either a) super in love with Neal or b) interesting in any way), Bomer’s portrayal of a man in desperation was fantastic. And the ending of the season finale??!?! I mean WHAT?!?!? I’m assured by things I’ve read elsewhere online that what appears to have happened could not actually have happened and I’m just going to keep my fingers crossed on that one… My ONLY complaint about this season would be that in the first four (at least) episodes, all the Elizabeth scenes were done with TERRIBLE CGI. I’d rather just see (or even only hear) the Burkes have a phone call than a badly CGIed lunch date.
Also I really liked this (what seemed like a VERY SHORT) season of Dark Blue. Tricia Helfer as a new cast member!! Ty gettin’ all messed up in stuff! There was a lot to enjoy.
But that was summer and despite Chicago weather’s insistence to the contrary, summer is o-v-e-r. [OK technically Haven and The Glades are not QUITE done with their summer seasons… Both are OK to watch but nothing wowza.]
Time for Fall TV!! What are you watching? I’m watching:
Sons of Anarchy. YAY YAY YAY so happy SOA is back. And so far, it’s been fantastic although each episode seems to have some devastating addition to the list of current problems. I am so worn out by the time the hour is over; it’s like I’ve been holding my breath the whole time. Clearly my emotional investment here is reaching dangerously high levels. I wish it was on every night but since it’s not, I generally rewatch each week’s episode at least two times (if not more).
Terriers. Almost a mock procedural, the world’s most unlikely pair of pseudo private detectives. I somehow seem to have missed the first half of the second episode (either that or I missed an entire episode) so I found some of this week confusing. But it’s got some charm and the dialogue is great.
NCIS. Somehow I just can’t quit this show. But I refuse to have anything to do with the horrific spin-off.
Rubicon. A carryover from summer (I think this may be its last week?). One of those shows where you really do NOT know what’s happening half of the time (moreso than something like Lost, I would say). Palpable tension and mystery. Sometimes the lack of clarity is frustrating but it keeps me interested. Although as with Lost or any of those type of shows, I, unlike most of my friends who watch, am FAR more interested in the weekly byplay between the characters than in figuring out the big mystery or even noticing the little tricks and clues hidden in the various storylines.
Chase. I decided to give this one a go and it’s at least a well-done procedural if nothing more. I’ve been a fan of Cole Hauser since Good Will Hunting so I’m always willing to watch his shows (I even watched K-Ville!), although I think he’s meant to be the #2 here. Sorry, the blonde girl is just not as interesting to me.
The Good Wife. I didn’t watch it last season but I caught up over the summer. I am not totally gaga about it but there’s some good acting and some interesting stuff going on (oh, Eli Gold, you are something else) and I find myself really interested while it’s on even if it’s not something I ever feel like rewatching later in the week.
How I Met Your Mother and The Office – the only two half hour, sitcom-y types I have on my schedule. They’re both a little tired out, some of the plot lines are going nowhere, but they both still make me laugh at least a little bit each week and at only a 30 minute investment, sometimes that’s the perfect amount of time to wind down with.
Chuck. I didn’t watch this show much in its first season. Second season I kept catching up via On Demand to the point where I finally had to admit I was watching the show. I still think it’s uneven. I still think it’s possible to do comedy without so many skeeeevy characters–Morgan is just gross sometimes. But there are some really engaging bits and oh hai Adam Baldwin and I love the Mission Impossible stuff that almost always turns into an almost failure saved by the Intercept kicking in.
Shows I’m on the fence about:
Blue Blood. I don’t know. I just got rid of two family dramas (see below), I’m not sure I need to introduce a new one. And I TOTALLY called that Tom Selleck doing the thing one of his kids saw him doing (I don’t want to spoil it for you if you’re actually interested in watching). I didn’t think the premiere was anything special, but I didn’t think it was terrible either (coughBONEScough) so I may watch it one more week before I decide.
Hawaii 5-0. So I think the casting of this show is insanely stupid and wrong. So you have Grace Park, huge star of BSG, and Daniel Dae Kim, huge star of Lost, at your disposal. HELLO THEY SHOULD BE THE LEADS. But instead they are the # 4 and 3 characters, respectively, and two moronic frat boys are the leads and the main lead is such a master of the stoic non-expression face that he can actually make an action scene look boring. (And the only show he’s ever been on was a huge failure. How (why?) would you hire him as the lead????) On the other hand – SURPRISINGLY the premiere was actually pretty solid and the filming isn’t bad at all. But I can watch this in 15 minute increments spread out over the week and not even remember that I didn’t finish an episode. Doesn’t really say much for it, does it. I love Grace Park, but I’m not sure this is worth it. Plus this BETTER NOT mess up her participation in The Border, the Canadian show I am completely obsessed with. (Which oddly I seem not to have written about here at all. It’s SO GOOD.)
Shows I’ve said goodbye to:
Bones. Wow, the season premiere SUCKED. Horrible dialogue, bad acting, and a completely contrived plotline. SEE YA!
Glee. I love the way they do the music on the show but even last season I was really not interested in what passes for the plot and the ridiculous number of twists and turns they try to work in every week–actually I would just prefer to see these kids do music/dance numbers for an hour with no plot whatsoever–and I find my patience for it has vanished. I’ll just check out the songs on iTunes and that’ll be enough for me.
Parenthood. The season premiere made me cringe a few times and I just can’t watch Lauren Graham and Peter Krause in their solo brother/sister scenes without wondering when they’re going to kiss (am I imagining hearing that they’re dating in real life?).
Brothers & Sisters. It’s hard NOT to get sucked into Berlanti’s family dramas (hello, Everwood, I miss you) but too many of these characters have become people I can’t care about and if Justin and Rebecca are breaking up then I’m really not interested.
Supernatural. I actually never watched this show until I buzzed through five seasons of DVDs in my month off school at the beginning of the summer. I think DVD watching has a way of keeping you engaged in shows that ride the mediocrity line because hey! instant gratification! you can see another one right away! and it’s hard NOT to get involved in storylines when you’ve just watched the character for 4 (or 8, or 12) hours and you know so much about what’s going on. But on a week-to-week basis, I just can’t seem to stay interested.
Castle. If Michael Trucco had become a permanent cast member, I would still be watching this. It was so much more interesting when he was added to the mix.
Shows that were too bad to watch:
Running Wilde. Couldn’t make it past the first 10 minutes. SO bad.
The Whole Truth. I really like both Tierney and Morrow but this show really wasn’t any good and I hate hate HATED the way they kept interrupting the summations with back clips. Like it had been several hours and we’d all forgotten what had happened earlier. No thanks.
I think that’s it. Heh. We won’t talk about the movies I watch (and rewatch) every week in addition to all this… If I actually spent ALL my TV time knitting (and other crafting) I would get SO much more done. But sometimes (during SOA for example) I am riveted to the screen and capable of nothing but watching. OK gotta go! 🙂
Fiction: The Time Traveler’s Wife, by Audrey Niffenegger
Re-read for me; new to Dad. Our June challenge book.
GirlReaction: I lovelovelove this book a completely crazypants amount. I read it shortly after I had moved to Chicago and there were so many great details from my new city in it, places I had been, places I needed to then seek out. For me, it’s incredibly romantic; but some of it may be related to being single for a very very long time–this idea of him being there, he’s off in another time, visiting a different you, but he exists, he is there, you just have to wait… It’s probably a selfish veneer but feels like there’s something very (sadly) (poignantly) romantic about that lonely yearning life.
Also I thought the (admittedly few) times you get to hear about Claire’s art were just FANTASTIC. I could picture her works so vividly. Why can’t someone make me wings? WHY!?! So amazing.
So yeah, I went completely ga-ga for this book and was sending it out as gifts to everyone I knew. Bought it for my parents the Christmas after I read it (maybe 2003?) and waited and waited for them to read it. Eventually Dad saw the movie. While most of my friends who had seen the book didn’t love the movie (Jenni said it was like watching the Cliff Notes), he said he liked it (well enough). Really liked the chemistry between McAdams and Bana–although he hasn’t had any particular urge to see it again.
I find it just as awesome to read the third, fourth…and 18th times around. I really still love it 100%.
DadReaction: Yeah. He did NOT like it. Thought it was an OK book about a relationship, liked some of the scenes, the monopoly game, little things like that. But just thought it was so weird overall. What a weird life for this woman and got to the point where he needed the story to straighten out (2/3 way through). Felt he didn’t need to read about Henry being 105 and Claire being 2 months old…said that every time he turned to the next chapter and read that parenthesis, he just wanted to throw the book across the room!!
He also felt like what if the 15 year old horny teenager Henry shows up when she’s 16. Why didn’t that ever happen? [Of course that can’t happen! When he’s 15 he doesn’t know she exists yet…] He couldn’t finish it. Too frustrated by the time / couldn’t go with the story anymore. Also didn’t like the drawn out stuff around her mom’s death.
SO…after Dad’s reaction to the book, I decided to try the movie. I couldn’t make it past the first 15 minutes!!
A) The movie makes it HIS story, which really takes away the whole point. Yes, in some ways, he is the more interesting or unusual character, but that’s part of the point, it’s not about him! it’s about being his wife, being the one that’s NOT that.
B) The movie makes the accident HIS FAULT!! Noooooooo. That’s just completely wrong. The accident is how he figures out his ability and it’s what saves him but it was NOT the cause. SOOOOO WRONG. And it’s SO irritating when stupid people connected with making movies out of good books make a BAD decision about something like that. How could they possibly think that was something that either 1) needed changing or 2) was a good idea to change? Increasing dramatic tension? Please. This story already has plenty of that. DISAPPROVE.
C) The casting of Gomez is just WRONG. I’m all for Ron Livingston in other roles but SO NOT HERE.
Verdict: I still love this book SO MUCH. Dad did NOT. He likes the movie OK. I could not even get through it. Disagreement reigns! 😉
Fiction: “Possession, by A.S. Byatt
Re-read. Our April challenge book.
Speaking of academia (as we were when reading Davies)…very dazzling. Funny and wicked about the academy and these kind of blighted lives; people that love literature and get trapped where they’re just drudges to this work–in this case especially, the woman with the index cards about the wife. Such a miserable life, inflicting misery on each other.
Really makes us laugh when the American woman sweeps in and creates all this sturm und drang–of course that’s how the Brits see us. We come in and just start breaking stuff!!
Maude = very well-written character. Interesting person with her own hurts and wounds, but a really good person. Always think it’s cool that they got together in a way.
The book itself is really a literary tour de force when you think about all the stuff Byatt wrote for it! Not just the book itself, but also Ash’s poetry, Christabel’s poetry, their letters, his wife’s diary, Sabine’s diary, various letters. Re-reading it though, we find ourselves skimming some parts. Artistically great, but do we need to read 8 pages of a Spenserian poem before moving on to the next chapter? Even in earlier readings, we remembered being kind of impatient at some parts–want to go on with the story. Didn’t need that much extra to see the ability–sometimes clogged the narrative flow. And the characters give you the exposition so you don’t need to have the whole thing.
Always knocked out by that connection with the mystical weirdness, the seance–when you realized she made him think the kid was dead. Very moving at the end–when you see he did get to meet the kid and realize the truth / and watching his wife thinking she’s hiding it from him. Byatt really projected you back into this other story–the modern story in a way was a happier one. This is one of those books that breaks my heart every time I read it.
Some scenes such a rush, and have a great mystery feel, as when Maude figures out the letters are hidden.
Verdict: still really good. So worth re-reading.
Fiction: The Fool’s Progress, by Edward Abbey
Re-read for Dad; new to me. Our May challenge book.
Total black comedy with incredibly (surprisingly) sad moments; you get to like the guy more than you ever though you could. The first chapter is just outright hilarious. Dad remembers hearing about Abbey at a reading once, picking that chapter, and apparently some women walked out. Personally, I feel you have to be able to enjoy well-written things (or even to apply this broader, well-done art in any genre) without imposing your filter. If you can never enjoy writing that doesn’t agree with your (for example) feminist viewpoints, you’re shutting out a huge portion of the world.
Abbey just reallys wrings out the in your face redneck stuff; takes a hard look at the mess a person can make of their life. He’s pretty hard on the guy for making dumb choices. But there’s always this underlying hopeful place–“maybe we’ll find a way to make it work” enthusiasm.
Dad has been going back and reading biographies of Abbey, trying to parse out which bits are autobioraphical and which aren’t–all the wild stories about Abbey and women stop the day he married his last wife. Both Abbey and the main character here are so involved with people: so much fun, so attractive, so adventurous, but (until the end) not a long-term guy.
Dad felt that on his second time reading it, some of it got a little tedious: got kinda tired of the trip, didn’t always enjoy the flashbacks–felt like they were always pulling you out of something you were enjoying (the current trip more engaging than the past memories).
A lot of individual scenes were so much fun. Love how he has all these horrifically failed relationships but also has friends pretty much everywhere he goes. Clearly this guy is bringing something to the table that makes keeping him around worthwhile.
For me, it’s reminisicent of Philip Roth’s Sabbath’s Theater–the dark, dark humor of it, a voice you’re not going to meet a lot in literature, a part of America that doesn’t get chronicled a lot.
Verdict: both enjoyed it a LOT.
Fiction: Rebel Angels, by Robertson Davies
Re-read. Our March challenge book.
Love reading novels as saturated in the world of academia as this one. Also adds something to the mix that there are people that weren’t quite in that world–Maria and her crazy gypsy relatives; Parlabane. Great mixture.
Davies is really funny about the academic stuff–and then the mystical stuff is his own spice. Very much a social comedy, like Trollope or someone; reading this right after reading Gatsby (with that veneer that social class matters), you do kind of live and die with Maria and those people, they become important to you. Maria’s so smart that when she gets pulled back into the gypsy world she’s pissed off.
Thinking about wacko Parlabane’s ability to just be in and around academia even though he’s so beyond the range of it; is it still like that? (Academics more tolerant of nutters in their midst?)
All the art stuff is so vivid that you’re picturing those drawings in your head, Davies really brings that stuff to life. (And in the third book of this trilogy, they do an opera that makes you believe that this thing exists. Same is true of Francis’ paintings in book 2.)
In this first book, Francis is like one of those planets exerting all this force, everything sort of orbiting around him, this figure you can’t quite picture.
Davies is more than a clever writer–very wise.
Verdict: Very enthusiastic double thumbs-up, both in previous reads and now.