Big Screen: The Fighter

Great performances. Christian Bale really steals the show (as that character would wish to), he’s practically unrecognizable. Wahlberg is obviously a good fit for the working class boxer boy, Adams is believable, the mom and dad were great, the sisters are just perfect, especially their reactions when they’re all crowded together in a space that would normally seat maybe 2 or 3 people.

And if you just want to see a pretty predictable but very well acted boxing movie, this will fit the bill.

But I thought it felt a little tired, a little “yup I’ve seen this before”. Not worth the hype.

Big Screen: The Green Hornet (3D)

There were some really funny moments in this movie (OMG the scene in the car, with the song. YES) and Seth Rogen and whoever played Kato had some great chemistry (that pseudo we’re in a relationship fighting between friends is often hilarious).

But I was extremely MEH on the 3D — I’m not sure what they thought it would be good for? — and I got very tired of Rogen’s shtick by the end of the movie. I would not have been as forgiving as Kato, after how he acted for about the last 45 minutes of the flick. Annoying.

If you are a huge Rogen fan, however, you will likely enjoy this just fine.

Big Screen: Black Swan

I thought Natalie Portman was really great and man I looooove ballet. I have always loved ballet. (I was a ballerina for much of childhood.)

But as I’ve been telling people all week Black Swan:ballet::The Wrestler: wrestling. [Same director, in case you weren’t aware.] In many, MANY ways, this is the same movie all over again. And while I love ballet, I HATED THE WRESTLER. Hated.

Aronofsky seems stuck on this entirely FALSE proposition that in order to really truly excel at your art (whatever that is, even wrestling) one must commit to the point of suicide via your art. Not only do I think that’s an entirely erroneous point of view, I think it’s a dangerous one to be promoting.

The trope of “being too technically perfect but unable to show emotion” is indeed a true one in ballet, but it’s also a very tired out, been there done that, trope in cinema, particularly when it comes to females. And the whole “she has to get a little crazy sexually in order to show emotion” stereotype also bores me to pieces. Not true, stupid, irritating.

The REAL story in this movie, and the one that should have been explored, is the relationship with the mother. A movie on that situation might have been truly interesting and the performances in those scenes were far more interesting than the rest of the movie.

I should say it is really effective as a psychological thriller. Some great shocks to the system — when you know who comes to the door to say “you were great” and Portman thinks that person is you know what? Yeah, that was great. When you know who does you know what in the hospital? WOAH.

But none of that changes how I felt overall.

Big Screen: True Grit

Really fantastic. Bridges blows the top off the barn, Damon is HILARIOUS, the girl is great, Brolin didn’t even annoy me to his usual extent. The setting is wonderful, GOD I LOVE WESTERNS (hey! I grew up on this stuff!).

This one’ll win a lot of awards and it does indeed deserve it.

Is it just me, though, or is Jeff Bridges not totally channeling Kris Kristofferson (both here AND in his role in Crazy Heart)? In that first scene, where you hear the drawl before you see him… Wow. (Not to take anything away from Bridges’ amazing performances.)

DadReaction chimed in to say that while he also loved the movie, it made him go back and re-read the book and the snake pit scene is a LOT WORSE in the book. He even had a hard time turning the pages! You’ve been warned!

Big Screen: Somewhere

I really (REALLY) liked this movie. I thought it was beautifully filmed and acted and got its point across really poignantly.

And then I got in the elevator with a ton of people who were in the same theater as me and they all HATED it.

Yes, it is really REALLY, I mean REALLY, slowly paced. One might call it glacially so. There were a couple times when I did find myself wondering “So is the camera (and the actors in the scene as well!) not going to move for an entire….song? Should I be watching the edges, is someone going to jump into the frame?” But hello, it’s Sofia Coppola, what are you expecting? This isn’t a Michael Bay film.

The film stock is all faded and dusty and super vignettey around the edges — I kept wondering if they had to treat it to achieve that effect or if they found some boxes of film that expired in the ’70s in an old warehouse and used that — and it just serves to reinforce the point.

Remember that horrific (not that I saw it and I certainly hope you didn’t see it) movie my former boyfriend Joaquin Phoenix and Casey Affleck made last year about the disintegration of celebrity and how empty and shallow that life is? Yeah, this film tells that story in a very different (and actually artistic) way. All the booze and drugs and access to ladies doesn’t make for a LIFE.

Also the ending is completely open-ended, you have to decide how you’re going to take it, and where you think he is.

Stephen Dorff is surprisingly great. (Not in that I thought he was bad previously but in that he’s never been on my radar as someone particularly good.)

Big Screen: Fair Game

Really depressing because it’s all true. Everyone knew there were no WMDS; Bush et his cronies just did not want to hear that and got rid of anyone who insisted on telling them that. Everyone that NEEDS to see this (and to see all this blatantly shown) is exactly the everyone that would never go to this movie anyway. Which is sad.

This was pretty powerfully done, good performances all around (Sam Shepherd has just a bit role but totally nails it, of course).

I also really liked that they included clips of the real Plame in the credits.

But I never quite believed them as a couple. It seemed like they styled Penn older than he is and Watts younger than she is or should be for the role (esp after seeing Plame in the credits) and it annoyed me a little. (Not that I didn’t think they were both v. good, I just occasionally had a “I’m not really believing them as a couple” moment.)

Note that my fellow moviegoer completely disagreed with me, loved their chemistry and loved the movie.

Big Screen: Rare Exports

This movie will definitely be in my top 5 for the year.

It’s called Rare Exports. It’s Finnish. It’s about Christmas. Fantastic writing, fantastic acting, fantastic directing. A fairytale that you would never predict or expect.

It opens in Chicago Christmas Eve at the Music Box. I believe it opens in NYC then as well. I hope word of mouth gets the film to more cities and more theaters because it is such a wonderful experience.

It is a piece of wildly creative, truly inventive, FANTASTIC filmmaking.

Thumbs up to the uppest of possible degrees.

DVD: Taking Chance

Calm. Slow. Elegaic.

I cried approximately 100 times during the 78 minutes it took to watch this flick.

I would say this movie* should be required viewing for those deciding to send our young’uns off to war…if I didn’t think those people were 90% jerks who don’t care about anyone but themselves and even seeing this couldn’t move their stonecold hearts.

*Along with others, like In the Valley of Elah, Hurt Locker, and Stop Loss–just to name movies made about THIS war. There are of course many other great movies made about other wars. They should get them all in a pack like Oscar voters. “Before making a really bad decision, take a minute and attempt to understand what these movies have to say about war.”

Big Screen: The Town

LOVELOVELOVELOVELOVE does not even begin to describe how I feel about this flick. This is some EXCELLENT moviemaking, y’all, and I encourage you to get yourself to a theater to see it. Now. Before I buy all the tickets. (I’ve seen it three times already.) It’s my #1 movie for 2010, edging Inception aside. I loved that flick, but I became much more emotionally involved with this one.

I was on the edge of my seat, spellbound, from beginning to end. Great performances, great mood, great settings. So well done. Serious kudos to Ben Affleck on becoming such a great director after such an oddly varied acting career. He also does some great acting in this and he’s totally rocking the Mark Messier skeletor look btw. Jeremy Renner is great; Jon Hamm is great; the gray-haired dude whose name I can never remember even tho he’s on my favorite show Sons of Anarchy is great (this dude); Blake Lively blows the roof off, her performance is a stunner and what a surprise.

Great car chases on one-way cramped up streets in Boston. Great performances by the neighborhood gangster thug florist and his right-arm: the feelings of menace are just so well done here. Hamm’s last line of dialogue: SUCH a great threat. I want to have a reason to use that line. Fun to see so many people from Affleck’s previous directing flick (Gone Baby Gone) popping up again here in very different roles.

SO steeped in its time and its place and its smalltown-in-the-big-city focus. SO many randomly great moments: the nuns getting out of the car and the cop turning his head; the hand on the tattoo when leaving the table; the pictures at the barbecue; the late-night walk to the AA meeting; the “CSI. All the CSIs. Bones.”… I could go on and on.

A heist movie that feels so original and so beyond the constraints of a heist.

I just loved it. Obv. Anyone need someone to go see it with them? 🙂

[p.s. quick DadReaction: pretty well done heist movie, but he hated the ending and thought one thing specifically was just “nope! wouldn’t happen!”]